Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 10-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in Submission.
- If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
Author Guidelines
BIOEDUKASI is a multidisciplinary journal, publishing original research across the whole spectrum of biology and biology learning. All forms of research within these fields are welcome, provided they are novel, don't focus on method optimization or confirmation or repetitions of previous research but with a different organism, and can make meaningful scientific and social contributions.
These submission guidelines will help you prepare your submission so as to greatly reduce its processing time. Although there are no strict formatting requirements for you initial submission, we do require that it conforms to the document structure laid out below, so reviewers are able to assess the paper based on its scientific merits.
Online submission procedure
By submitting to BIOEDUKASI, authors attest that:
- The submission is an original work, free from any form of plagiarism (text, data, and figures).
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it under consideration by another journal.
- The submission has been approved by all co-authors and relevant authorities (e.g. an institution or sponsor).
- The manuscript has been (to the best of the author abilities) written in good English and is free of grammatical errors. It has been checked with a proofreading by a language editor.
Submissions to BIOEDUKASI should be through its online submission system. There are no strict formatting requirements for the initial submission, as long as the article structure conforms with our guidelines (see the manuscript structure section below). Manuscripts that advance to the revision stage will then be required to be formatted appropriately (see the formatting section). This enables authors to focus on the scientific content of their manuscript, along with speeding up the article's processing time.
Author registration. Authors without an BIOEDUKASI account are required to create an account before beginning their submission. Make sure that the "Author" role is selected in the Role dropdown menu, otherwise you will not be able to proceed with the submission.
Author(s) data. The submitting author is required to complete the author(s) data during the submission. Please ensure that the affiliation addresses are complete and written exactly as they appear on the manuscript.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuscript metadata. [Manuscript full templates can be found here]. [Manuscript Anonimous templates can be found here] Please complete at least the following information related to the manuscript:
Title
The title of articles in English should describe the main content of manuscripts, be informative, concise, and not too wordy (12-15 words only), and should not contain formulas. Fill in the title field of the manuscript, capitalizing the first sentence. Title in the manuscripts must be typed in Times News Roman (TNR), size 14pt.
The author's name
Full name without academic degrees and titles, written in capital letters. Manuscripts written by groups need to be supplemented with complete contact details.
Name of affiliation for each author
The author's name should be accompanied by complete affiliation address
Coresponding Author
The name, address, and email of the corresponding author must be included.
Abstract
Paste the abstract into the abstract field; ensure the formatting is consistent with the manuscript (e.g., superscript and italics). Manuscripts must be typed in Times News Roman (TNR), size 9, with 1.0 line spacing, and a maximum of 200 words.
Keywords
Provide a minimum of three words/phrases and a maximum of five words/phrases, written alphabetically.
Introduction
This section should briefly explain the background of the study, provide a short review of the pertinent literature, state the originality of the research, and state the research objectives. [Times New Roman 10, single space, normal, Contains at least 15 references from journals from the last 10 years]
Literature Review (if applicable)
Research Methods
This part explains how the research is conducted, research design, data collecting techniques, instrument development, provide sufficient details of the methods including the ethical conduct and data analysis techniques. [Times New Roman 10, single space, normal]
Results and Discussion
Results should be clear and concise. This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature. [Times New Roman 10, single space, normal]
Well-designed tables and/or figures should be a key feature of this section, conveying key observations to the reader. Any information presented in tables and figures should not be repeated in the text, but the text should focus on the importance of the research's key findings. Generally, journal papers will contain three to seven figures and tables. The same data cannot be presented as tables and figures. The research results are discussed to answer the research problem, as well as the research objectives and hypotheses. Discussion. It is strongly recommended that the discussion focus on why and how the research findings occurred, and the extent to which these findings can be applied to other relevant problems.
Conclusion
The main conclusions of the study may be presented in a comprehensive short Conclusions section, which must stand alone section. Author should elaborate the result and discussion into difference ways. Explain the contribution of your research to science. The conclusion is written in the whole paragraph, not the points per point. [Times New Roman 10, single space, normal]
Limitations (if any)
Acknowledgements (Optional)
Contributors not listed as authors should be acknowledged, and their specific contributions should be described. All funding sources for the work should be acknowledged; the research funder and grant number (if any) should be provided for each funding source.
References
References are placed at the end of the manuscript. Authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all references. Use IEEE for in-text citations and the reference list. Do not use footnotes. Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Strongly be suggested to use reference managers such as Mendeley, Zotero, or Endnote. .). [Times New Roman 10, single space, normal]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cover letter
In addition to the manuscript and its supplementary files, include a brief cover letter stating the significance of the research and the novelty of its results, and how it will be of interest to the readers of BIOEDUKASI. Authors should suggest two potential reviewers for their manuscript, who should have no conflicts of interest. [Cover letter templates can be found here]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review process
All manuscripts submitted to BIOEDUKASI undergo a rigorous screening and review process to ensure that they fit into the journal's scope and are of sufficient academic quality and novelty to appeal to BIOEDUKASI's readership.
Initial screening. A newly submitted manuscript will be screened by the Editor-in-Chief for its conformity to BIOEDUKASI scope and basic submission requirements.
Peer-review. If the manuscript passes the initial screening stage, it will be assigned to a handling editor, who will then send it to at least two experts in the relevant field to undergo a double-blind peer-review. Manuscripts that fail to pass the initial screening will be rejected without further review.
First decision. A decision on a peer-reviewed manuscript will only be made upon the receipt of at least two review reports. In cases where reports differ significantly, the handling editor will invite an additional reviewer to get a third opinion before making a decision. At this stage, a manuscript can either be rejected, asked for revisions (minor or major), accepted as is, or (if significant changes to the language or content are required) recommended for resubmission for a second review process. If it is accepted, the manuscript will be returned to the submitting author for formatting. The final decision to accept the manuscript will be made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the recommendation of the handling editor and following approval by the board of editors.
Revision stage. A manuscript that requires revisions will be returned to the submitting author, who will have up to two weeks to format and revise the manuscript, following which it will be reviewed by the handling editor. The handling editor will determine whether the changes are adequate and appropriate, as well as whether the author(s) sufficiently responded to the reviewers' comments and suggestions. If the revisions are deemed to be inadequate, this cycle will be repeated (the manuscript will be returned to the submitting author once more for further revision).
Final decision. At this stage, the revised manuscript will either be accepted or rejected. This decision is dependent whether the handling editor finds the manuscript to have been improved to a level worthy of publication. If the author(s) are unable to make the required changes or have done so to a degree below BIOEDUKASI's standards, the manuscript will be rejected.
Proofing and typesetting. If the manuscript is accepted, it will go through a final round of editing and proofreading by an in-house language editor, following which it will be typeset and returned to the submitting author for final approval. All authors must approve this final version of the article before it can be officially published.
Manuscript processing time
Processing time varies from one manuscript to another, depending on how long it takes to receive all of the reviewers' reports and how quickly the author(s) revise the manuscript. On average, BIOEDUKASI's manuscript processing time ranges from 4 to 8 weeks. BIOEDUKASI cannot guarantee a specific publishing time for a manuscript, nor can it under any circumstances promise a sped-up publication process.
Checklist
Author(s) can use the following checklist when preparing their submission.
Files to send
- Cover letter (in doc, docx, rtf, or odf format).
- Manuscript full (in doc, docx, rtf, or odf format).
- Manuscript Anonymous (in doc, docx, rtf, or odf format).
General formatting
- Ideally between 4000--6000 words in length (excluding tables, captions, and references).
- Either British or American English spelling, not a mixture of both.
For example author can download template below:




https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1920-0515